Multifaceted Design Practioner
PROJECT DETAILS
Professional work: SJK Architects, Mumbai
Client: JSW Foundation
Location: Dolvi village, Alibaug, India
Year involved: 2016 - May 2017
COLLABORATORS
Lead Architects: Shimul Javeri Kadri, Sarika Shetty
Team: Isha Hans, Bhavin Patel, Vijay Sakpal
Others: Structural Consultant, HVAC Consultant, MEP Consultant Hospital Consultant
ROLE
Conceptual Design, Design Development, Architectural Articulation, Detailed Drawings, Consultant collaboration, Presentation Drawings
TOOLS
Hand sketches, Vectorworks, Photoshop, Google SketchUp, AutoCAD
category
Experience Design | Spatial Design
Corporate Social Responsibility project
JSW Foundation is the social development arm of JSW (Jindal Steel Work) group. The foundations intended to build a hospital for its steel plant workers in the village of Dolvi, Alibaug.
Hospitals are daunting environments for both the patient and the patient family.
There is now widespread consensus that a hospital’s physical environment can have a big effect on patient recovery and efficacy of care, as well as efficiency of working for the staff. Keeping this as the prime focus of the design, the intent was to create a patient and staff-friendly space, one that expresses compassion, wellness, and beauty.
Humble
Inclusive
Playful
Hospital Building that resembles village houses connected by corridors to create a sense of familiarity.
Adaptation of Local Architecture
The site is located in the coastal town of Alibaug and receives heavy rainfall every year. The vernacular architecture makes use of large overhangs & sloping roofs to protect against this.
Borrowing from the language of local houses, the hospital is proposed to have cantilevered balconies and deep roof overhangs. In addition to being climatically responsive, the use of similar elements as the village houses is expected to foster a sense of familiarity for the incoming rural patients.
Introverted building overlooking courtyards
The three-story hospital is planned as two linear strips joined at one end and connected by intermediate corridors. All the corridors, passages, and waiting areas overlook the courtyards thus formed. This pattern of opening up the building towards lush spaces acts as a relief architecturally while still allowing visual connection and interaction.
In areas like OT and ICU where transmission of infection is a concern, all corridors and passages are covered with glass.
Character of Courtyards
The courtyards serve two important functions:
Physical Model
Earthy and Warm Aesthetics
The proposed aesthetic articulation of the building is earthy, has warmth, and looks like an up-scaled version of the village house. The material for construction is pigmented concrete in beige, which implies a welcoming and friendly nature. Additionally, it reflects most of the wavelengths of white light thereby ensuring that the courtyards are aglow with natural light.
Experience-based approach to Architecture
This project was an Aha! moment in my career journey, as I realized that I was already practicing an experience-based approach to Design. While 'human-centered' was beginning to become a buzzword for UX and HCI design, my architectural design process had always accounted for it starting with Ethnography and Field Research.
Focus on an ignored stakeholder group
The traditional architecture design process involves the client and other subject matter experts (or consultants) but the voices of some groups of end-users may not be heard or even considered. We focussed the spatial design on the experience of rural patients and their families because they are a key stakeholder group whose mental wellbeing is often ignored in the process. The final design was a direct outcome of this intent along with accommodating an efficient workflow for the healthcare staff.
Participatory and co-design in Architecture
Despite our bold stance, we were unable to take direct feedback from the rural community as the design evolved. I wonder, how might we have included the rural patients in the design process. How might we have understood their concerns firsthand as the prospective users of the space, instead of making assumptions? How might we have co-designed with them, for them?